Wall Paint For Red Floors

Student Council decides "Talk" to the plenary claims (Addendum)

In today's (28.11.) StuRasitzung was hotly debated and controversial. Subject of the discussion were two drafts of student demands.
First draft (which you can read below in the blog) of the striking students and the other one of the Student Council in a work group was created.
After much back and forth was to discuss the present Student Council Alliance Partner, with 17 votes to 14 for the demands of the strikers. Following
began again that, compared to the first, brief, discussion of the order of the key demands. Now the demand
were 1.2 (see below) as a first point, debt 1.1 (see below) as the second point and 1.3 (see below) was identified as the third point.
The official opening was decided that only the "strikers" is removed from the previous formulation. So the official opening is: "The students put the following key requirements set as a basic thought:" This is intended to underline the legitimacy of claims by the Student Council.
was partially but also about five minutes or longer discussed, and then repeatedly voted on whether to stand behind a claim by a period or an exclamation point. In the end, was miraculously still officially decided to use a period.

I almost did the evening with the quote: "We wanted to behead the king, but then only have the guards shot dead, but the gun mitder we did it was at least nice! "described, but at 0:35 clock gave Mandy a wundarbar clear the air and above all fair statement and requested those present to position themselves to the demands and thus towards solidarity and support to progress to show.

For good or not good end that I would leave to the reader or the audience, the following was stated:
It was agreed that the Überschrifen the core demands have to be discussed at this to decide.
Darufhin present left the strikers and their advocates in the Student Council meeting, as they had demanded as a minimum, to take over the Überschrifen 1to1, thus clearly to be on the side of the strikers.
The Student Council was unable to take decisions and it could make no further discussion or vote.

It remains to be noted that the present majority of the Student Council are indirectly against the existing demands of the striking students and is committed to a split between strikers and the legitimacy of the students officially emerge.

(Created during the session Sura Stephen Ebert)